Brussels Blog
Tuesday, January 30, 2007
  Ideas


Just a bit more on Church and State...


Malta is not a Catholic state ruled by an archbishop but a secular republic (Kenneth Zammit Tabona, The Times of Malta, 30/01/2007)

It is deeply insulting and offensive to all those of us who would like to know that we are not living in the Catholic equivalent of an Islamic State. (Daphne Caruana Galizia, The Malta Independent on Sunday, 28/01/2007)

Whatever happened to give unto Ceasar what is Ceasar's? Why do we live in a society where these things still need spelling out? (J'accuse)


The problem with the whole debate on divorce, the new Archbishop and the role of the Church in Malta is that people seem to position the discourse in terms of a choice between two opposing poles. On the one hand the "Caesar gets what's his" option (in which case we can call ourselves secular and 'modern'), on the other the "God gets to play Caesar and Caesar gets to play God" scenario (where we end up looking like a Catholic version of an Islamic State).

Things are a bit more complicated and interesting than that. A little voyage around the world reveals that there are 3 main categories of Church-State relationship and several particularities within each category. I find it weird that this stuff didn't feature in our political theory or philosophy of law classes at the good old UoM.

Separation - No official State religion. Private law governs religious matters. As the US experience has shown, this does not preclude political parties from leaning towards religious groups in terms of ideology. Three types of separation can be identified: Pure separation (France, the US, Mexico, Turkey). 'Agreed' separation based on a bilateral treaty between Church and State in which the Church is considered a legal entity governed by public law and is granted public funding (Germany, Austria, Croatia, Spain, Italy, Portugal, Slovakia). Hostile separation in which the State is based on an atheist or agnostic ideology and eliminates religion from public life (Cuba, China, North Korea)
Association - In which the State upholds a "national" religion (which establishes the identity of the nation) or an "official" religion. This may sit comfortably with freedom of conscience and a secular approach to civil status (civil marriage, divorce legislation, abortion etc) and the full respect of other religions (The United Kingdom, Finland, Denmark and others)

Collusion - The State purports to be the guarantor of one religion which is confused with the national identity. The clergy are civil servants and play a political role, religious doctrine is applied to civil status issues such as marriage, divorce and abortion. In some countries other beliefs are tolerated (Pakistan, Algeria, Egypt, Israel) while in others they are banned (Saudi Arabia). The Vatican is a case apart since it is the only true theocracy in the world: the spiritual and temporal are joined in the authority of the Sovereign Pontiff.

Malta is an interesting case which, as things stand, appears to straddle the Association and Collusion categories. There are three crucial factors which make this possible.

First, both the Head of State and several members of the ruling class (including the Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister but also large chunks of the Opposition) appear to base their ideology on their belief system, projecting these values as national values rather than purely personal ones. This was made patently clear when President Fenech Adami indicated that he would probably not sign a divorce law passed by the House. But let's not ignore the fact that letters in local newspapers are still full of biblical quotations. Representatives represent the represented.

Second, following the Church-Mintoff standoff, the Labour party came to the conclusion that it would be unwise to take on Malta's Catholic majority. Essentially the debate on Church-State relations ended in the 1980s, handed the Nationalists a comfortable lead and 25 years later the 'pragmatic' Labour Party rivals the Nationalist Party in terms of devout Catholic representatives. Alfred Sant, himself an atheist, could face a mutiny if he rocks the boat at this stage. Labour MP Adrian Vassallo has already made it clear that if his party were to pledge to introduce divorce legislation, he would not stand for election. In other words, Malta's socialists are light years away from Zapatero with whom they share seats in the European Parliament.

Third, and perhaps crucially, Malta lacks a convincing and influential intellectual class which is prepared to move the debate and the country forward. Anyone who follows debates in Italy, Poland and Spain knows that the big ideological battles of today still pit liberals against conservatives (and the Church) on issues like the Pacs, gay marriage and stem-cell research. In Italy's La Repubblica, for instance, the extent of the Vatican's ingerenza into local politics is often debated and analysed. Granted, these countries have moved on from debating divorce. However, let's not forget that Spain only got a divorce law in 1981 after massive opposition from the Church and conservatives. Malta is not the only country in Europe where the Catholic Church's doctrine still plays an important ideological role in debates. And it's not a 16th century country just because it lacks divorce legislation. But Malta is the only country in Europe which lacks a convincing and respected progressive 'voice' to challenge and question the predominant conservative world view. Most small countries in Europe (think Luxembourg and Belgium) naturally feed off the bigger intellectual debate going on around them in France, Germany and Holland. Malta doesn't quite have that advantage which makes debates there appear rather surreal - from where I'm standing at any rate. It's enough to realise that the solitary voices of Daphne Caruana Galizia and Salvu Balzan still ring out like some sort of cutting-edge avant-garde anomaly.

The fact that on the ground some people have chosen to adopt different lifestyles and that marriages are breaking down isn't proof that we've suddenly become a secular, liberal nation. A few thousand people sleeping with their lovers and missing their Sunday Mass won't alter the institutional set-up. It takes ideas and free-thinking people who're ready to risk their career to do that.
 
Comments:
Thanks for the quote. I think mine is taken out of context though. My question was addressed to someone on the pro-divorce front who expected the church to change its ways and suddenly be pro-divorce...
 
Malta is an interesting case which, as things stand, appears to straddle the Association and Collusion categories.

Actually, most of the examples you give straddle two categories. Doesn't the UK, to mention an example, show elements of "collusion"? I mean, Anglican bishops sit in the House of Lords (the clergy as civil servants). Putting France, the US, Mexico and Turkey (and Christianity and Islam) in the same category is ignoring important differences.
 
Jacques - I read your post called Sunday Logic as a list of 'principles', one of which was the Caesar premise. It didn't really matter who you were addressing it to.

Fausto - my post was clearly less about describing each and every practical detail of each and every system and more about showing that the Church-State issue is a tad more complex than people are making out to be while describing some general categories.

Since you picked on the Anglican bishops, here's how La Repubblica's correspondent in London introduced his article on Blair's latest plans to reform The Lords:

"E' uno degli ultimi anacronismi della Gran Bretagna: evoca, gia' a partire dal nome, club per anziani gentiluomini, privilegi aristocratici, profumo di sigari di marca."

About Christianity-Islam, Turkey and Malta are wonderful examples of how 'Christian' nations don't necessarily take the separation of Church and State more seriously than their 'Muslim' counterparts.

E oer finire, did you agree with my analysis of the Maltese situation?
 
E oer finire, did you agree with my analysis of the Maltese situation?

No. Because Malta even shows features of a state where there's separation: we have a bilateral treaty between Church and State, Church is considered a legal entity govered by public law and Church is granted public funding.

Indeed, it might be that Labour's attempt to "devolve" Church property in the 1980s was a sign of lack of separation between the two. And one of the arguments of the then AG (Edgar Mizzi) in the Government's attepted take-over of Church schools then was that schoolchildren already received religious (Catholic) instruction in state schools obviating the need for Church schools.
 
MALTA BLOGS COMPETITION 2008 starting from Tuesday, 1st April 2008

1. Blog of the Month
2. Blog of the Year
3. Observer of the Year

My hope is that you not only participate but also encourage others (bloggers / readers) to participate. This helps to promote and strengthen the blogosphere in Malta and that related to Malta. The contest can also help blogs to keep their true meaning and the purpose for which they were originally opened while also encouraging them to remain veritable virgins.

More information on the right side-bar on the front page of www.sandrovella.org

Direct links:
The blogs list: www.sandrovella.org/listablogs.html
The regulations: www.sandrovella.org/blogrules.html
The voting application: www.sandrovella.org/blogsub.html
 
Post a Comment



<< Home
TOUT EST KITCH, SI L'ON VEUT.

ARCHIVES
May 2005 / June 2005 / July 2005 / August 2005 / September 2005 / October 2005 / November 2005 / December 2005 / January 2006 / February 2006 / March 2006 / April 2006 / May 2006 / June 2006 / July 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / February 2007 / November 2007 /


Powered by Blogger

Mit-18 ta' Dicembru 2005
Free Web Counter
Friends, Bloggers, (mainly) Countrymen
  • Fool's Cap - Malta's intelligentsia laid bare
  • J'accuse - Probably, Malta's most popular blog
  • Pierre J. Mejlak - Maltese literature spreads its wings
  • Toni Sant - In the beginning there was Toni
  • Wired Temples - Malta as centre of the universe
  • Il-Blobb tas-Sibt Filghaxija - Immanuel Mifsud
  • Xifer - Hibernating on the Edge
  • Triq il-Maqluba - Il-Malti fuq ruhu (bhalissa bil-brejk f'post griz)
  • Neebother - Thinking in the Cold
  • Malta, 9 Thermidor - The Right's Rottweiler
  • Aaron Farrugia's Blog - The beginning of the end of door-to-door visits?
  • Inutile de degeler - Cryptic stuff from the land of surrealism
  • Ajjut! Ajjut! - The aches and pains inflicted by Brand Malta
  • Lost in Thought - And Lots Going On
  • Mexxej Hassieb - Down, High and Out in Prague and Valletta
  • Kim Bah Lee - Bruxelles a l'anglaise